9/11

A Possibility?

Published on March 28, 2006 By highbass In World Trade Issues

just watch the video and you be the judge... this one is more complete then most others i've seen

Link

Comments (Page 1)

Daiwa

on Mar 29, 2006

And it's possible monkeys will fly outta my ass.

Likely? I don't think so.

highbass

on Mar 29, 2006

it would be a huge conspiracy but there are some things that strike me as odd... especially the pentagon incidence...

Dr Guy

on Mar 29, 2006

Daiwa is right. And if you are worried about the pentagon incident, maybe you can watch the film showing windows on a plane crashing into it. Sorry, this is just a rehash of the French kook theory.

Dr Guy

on Mar 29, 2006

Oh, BTW, you may want to check out this link. Kind of sinks that conspiracy theory. But they will ignore it since it does not fit into their kook theory. http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 29, 2006

Oh, BTW, you may want to check out this link. Kind of sinks that conspiracy theory. But they will ignore it since it does not fit into their kook theory. Link

Dr. Guy, I took a look at your link but it doesn't really debunk some of my major questions. Like take Q2. Okay they explain the height but what about the wingspan? Also what about the engine and the wheel that were found? These are three questions I have yet to find a legitimate arguement for the 757. I cannot simply overlook such questions. Maybe I missed the answers.

Dr Guy

on Mar 29, 2006

Maybe I missed the answers

I think you did. The link was just one of the links that blows this kook theory out of the water. This one dealing with the Pentagon plane. And the kooks contention that the plane (first) that hit the WTC did not have windows is refuted by photgraphic evidence.

Look, I got questions too. But I am not going to hang myself out on a limb trying to prove it was a conspiracy. The problem with a conspiracy that large is that there are too many people involved, and they cannot keep their mouths shut.

But the beauty of this kook is that if you do not believe him, you are part of the conspiracy. A perfect crime in his book.

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 29, 2006

I wasn't talking about WTC only the Pentagon. I was watching the news when I watched the second one hit the other tower. I don't question that it was a passenger jet. I look at the evidence presented about Pentagon and I am just like Hmmmm. Seems fishy. I'm not looking for a conspiracy here just the facts. And unfortunately it seems like I have to sort out more trash than the crash.

Dr Guy

on Mar 29, 2006

And unfortunately it seems like I have to sort out more trash than the crash.

Fortunately, the facts are out there. I no doubt beleive that much is still not told. But there were too many witnesses that at least we know the how, just not the why. The Kooks try to contruct the how, in the face of irrefutable evidence. Now if they instead consentrated on the Why, that would be another issue. (That French Guy kind of did).

highbass

on Mar 30, 2006

showing windows on a plane crashing into it

crashing into what the pentagon? if so i would love to see that

Daiwa

on Mar 30, 2006

You'll recall that there was video footage of the first passenger jet crashing into the WTC, not just the second - that French camera crew interviewing a firefighter on the street when they heard the low-flying plane and swung the camera up to film it.

That's just one point. The logistics of a "conspiracy" this large are simply not doable in anything but a Hollywood film and someone's fevered imagination. Take the theories that the towers & WTC7 were taken down by demolition charges - just explain to me how the conspirators could have pulled that off, something that would have required weeks of work that could not possibly have been hidden from view. I don't care that the buildings fell down "too straight" - I'll just accept that gravity works.

A whole bunch of people were supposedly murdered just to take out Ron Brown, too, but I don't buy that, either.

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 30, 2006

Yeah the WTC conspiracy doesn't hold much water.

I don't care that the buildings fell down "too straight" - I'll just accept that gravity works.

Is there any record of any wind? If it was a windy day and they came straight down then maybe.

Dr Guy

on Mar 30, 2006

crashing into what the pentagon? if so i would love to see that

No, the WTC. That was one of their statements. That the first plane did not have windows.

Secret Squirrel

on Mar 30, 2006

One of the better conspiracy sites is AboveTopSecret.com

Here's one article on their site that is entitled: Evidence That A Boeing 757 Really Did Impact the Pentagon on 9/11

www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 30, 2006

Thanks Secret Squirrel.

cactoblasta

on Mar 30, 2006

I don't care that the buildings fell down "too straight" - I'll just accept that gravity works.

It's a building, and it didn't collapse until well after the second plane hit. Considering that it fell apart in giant boulder sized clumps that probably weighed tonnes or close to it, it's not surprising the pieces had extremely limited ballistic paths. Wind resistance of any kind on a multi-tonne chunk of rock would kill flight speed.

I would be much more surprised if the building fell over rather than collapsing.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!